|
07-29-2019, 06:15 AM
| #1 |
| Registered User Joined: Apr 2017 From: USA Posts: 708 | fast, but
didn't show the hits, didn't show the time, can't tell the distance between the targets, can't tell what the distance from shooter to target is, and it looked like 9mm or wussy .45 loads. Overlooking such vital info is probably done on purpose. If it was all done to spec, and all good hits, with a .45 and full charger ammo, 10 yds, 3 yds between the targets, edge to edge, 4.5 seconds would be a fantastic time. |
|
07-29-2019, 07:08 AM
| #2 |
| Registered User Joined: May 2004 From: Central Arkansas Posts: 5,157 |
Obviously can't tell exactly, but he took six steps and was only about halfway to the targets; so ten yards may be right. What's wrong with 9mm? |
|
07-31-2019, 03:27 PM
| #3 | |
| Registered User  Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 4,970 | Quote:
| |
| | |
|
08-01-2019, 01:45 PM
| #4 |
| Registered User  Joined: Jun 2004 From: Canadian Badlands Posts: 8,838 |
Melvin, is just jealous after all marksmanship is a perishable skill and he can not go shooting anymore!
|
|
08-02-2019, 12:22 PM
| #5 |
| Registered User Joined: Apr 2017 From: USA Posts: 708 |
nothing wrong with a 9mm, just that comparing scores and times with 9 vs full charge .45 is invalid. The .45/s 1/3rd greater recoil is either going to slow down repeat hits, or spread those hits on the targets.
|
 |
|
| |
| Search tags for this page |
testing,testing9241945
Click on a term to search for related topics.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
2Likes
Linear Mode
