pof trump

Terry G · 02-28-2018, 04:54 PM

His latest, and probably best showing of his contempt for the rule of law and our Constitution. "take the gun's now, we'll look at due process later." Not fake news or a clever political chess move. He has sold us, and the Constitution out.

John in AR · 03-01-2018, 06:30 AM

Not a huge Trump fan; he was just the better of the options at the time. Imagine if Hillary was in office now instead of Trump - I suspect it would be substantially worse.

Garand · 03-01-2018, 06:50 AM

The way I see it, with both sides and their extreme, knee jerk reactions to the problem, this is political posturing as they will never attempt to find common ground.

boati · 03-06-2018, 06:29 AM

no common ground is possible when the other side is irrational and tyrannical. what can they give us? nothing. So why give them anything?

John in AR · 03-06-2018, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garand

The way I see it, with both sides and their extreme, knee jerk reactions to the problem, this is political posturing as they will never attempt to find common ground.

On the 'common ground' thing, anyone who actively seeks to punish innocent people (ie, take away their legally-purchased property) is someone with whom I'm morally opposed to having common ground.

I received an email on this topic last week; an article by Howard Galganov, who is usually fairly good but had a retarded comparison & recommendation this time. He suggested in the article that the political 'right' go along with the banning of AR-15's specifically, and the 'left' go along with the banning of late-term abortions.

From the article:

Quote:

Compromise is often good.

On gun law, Republicans oppose banning assault weapons such as the AR-15, the one the Parkland shooter used, because of the numbers, power and contributions of gun owners and the NRA. Democrats oppose banning late-term abortion because of the numbers, power and contributions of the rising left, feminists and Planned Parenthood.

The idea: Trade banning assault weapons for banning late-term abortion. Make illegal a killing machine and a killing procedure.
In both cases the lives of children would be saved.

Wouldn’t this clean some of the air? Wouldn’t we all breathe a little easier?

Bear in mind when reading my reply to the email, that the person who forwarded me this email is a customer, a former carrier pilot, and someone I consider a friend.

My reply:

Quote:

Just FYI and to vent a little, I take HUGE umbrage with the suggestion at the end; the suggestion of banning both AR’s and late-term abortions with the claim that it would “make illegal a killing machine and a killing procedure”. Late-term abortion kills 100% of the time. I own eight AR’s, and they have killed a total of ZERO people. I shoot between 8,000 and 9,000 rounds of ammo a year, have fired more than 350,000 rounds in my life, and have killed a total of ZERO people.

I usually like Galganov, but in this case, he sounds like every other emotion-based asshat in this discussion and can lick my anus. And I’m pretty sure Jesus would tell him the same.

boati · 08-24-2019, 12:53 PM

I dont gaf if getting rid of ARs would stop ALL the criminal activity in the US. **** em, they dont get my wife's, unless they want SHTF.

Terry G · 08-24-2019, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boati

I dont gaf if getting rid of ARs would stop ALL the criminal activity in the US. **** em, they dont get my wife's, unless they want SHTF.

Cool down, Melvin. I'm positive they won't get YOUR AR-15.

John in AR · 08-26-2019, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boati

I dont gaf if getting rid of ARs would stop ALL the criminal activity in the US. **** em, they dont get my wife's, unless they want SHTF.

What's different this time? Last time, they got ALL your guns and ammo without a fight, didn't they..?

Garand · 08-26-2019, 09:19 AM

Just curious, have they started arming meter maids yet in the US. It would be a more dignified way for Melvin to surrender next time.

boati · 09-15-2019, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John in AR

What's different this time? Last time, they got ALL your guns and ammo without a fight, didn't they..?

it wasn't shtf, I was 13 years younger and I didn't have to fend for anyone else. ALL major differences. You pussies would just them up, period, no matte what. garand wont even TALK about making silencers, he's so scared of his commie "leaders".

Garand · 09-16-2019, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boati

it wasn't shtf, I was 13 years younger and I didn't have to fend for anyone else. ALL major differences. You pussies would just them up, period, no matte what. garand wont even TALK about making silencers, he's so scared of his commie "leaders".

Talk is cheap Melvin, you have already stated that if the SHTF, that "wifey" and the kids are on their own.

John in AR · 09-16-2019, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boati

...I didn't have to fend for anyone else...

That's good, if it's true that you would indeed fend for others in your family now. Used to be (as recently as this year), you said the opposite.

Garand · 09-17-2019, 06:02 AM

Melvin, it is not that I won't talk about making silencers, I just don't see a need for them currently. Remember, in my country suppressors are heavily regulated to the police and military only.

02-28-2018, 04:54 PM	#1
Terry G Registered User Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 4,937	What do you think pof Trump now? His latest, and probably best showing of his contempt for the rule of law and our Constitution. "take the gun's now, we'll look at due process later." Not fake news or a clever political chess move. He has sold us, and the Constitution out. Last edited by Terry G; 02-28-2018 at 04:56 PM.

08-26-2019, 09:19 AM	#9
Garand Registered User Joined: Jun 2004 From: Canadian Badlands Posts: 8,797	Just curious, have they started arming meter maids yet in the US. It would be a more dignified way for Melvin to surrender next time. Kpdpipes and BigEd like this.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-01-2018, 06:30 AM	#2
John in AR Registered User Joined: May 2004 From: Central Arkansas Posts: 5,103	Not a huge Trump fan; he was just the better of the options at the time. Imagine if Hillary was in office now instead of Trump - I suspect it would be substantially worse.

03-01-2018, 06:50 AM	#3
Garand Registered User Joined: Jun 2004 From: Canadian Badlands Posts: 8,797	The way I see it, with both sides and their extreme, knee jerk reactions to the problem, this is political posturing as they will never attempt to find common ground.

03-06-2018, 06:29 AM	#4
boati Registered User Joined: Apr 2017 From: USA Posts: 658	no common ground is possible when the other side is irrational and tyrannical. what can they give us? nothing. So why give them anything?

08-24-2019, 12:53 PM	#6
boati Registered User Joined: Apr 2017 From: USA Posts: 658	I dont gaf if getting rid of ARs would stop ALL the criminal activity in the US. **** em, they dont get my wife's, unless they want SHTF.

09-17-2019, 06:02 AM	#13
Garand Registered User Joined: Jun 2004 From: Canadian Badlands Posts: 8,797	Melvin, it is not that I won't talk about making silencers, I just don't see a need for them currently. Remember, in my country suppressors are heavily regulated to the police and military only.

pof trump

trump pof