SAME dumbasses who claim 223 is so feeble - Arms Locker
Arms Locker Gun Forum
Go Back   Arms Locker > Arms Locker > Reloading


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-2016, 09:35 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,430
SAME dumbasses who claim 223 is so feeble

at 1/4 mile will be arguing how 22lr is so dangerous at a mile. :-) you can't have both, ya know.
 
Remove Ads
Old 07-30-2016, 09:59 AM   #2
Registered User
 Terry G's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 4,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by justme View Post
at 1/4 mile will be arguing how 22lr is so dangerous at a mile. :-) you can't have both, ya know.
Who said the 5.56MM/.223 was feeble at 450 Yards? The .22 will reach over a mile and can cause injury at that distance. Who said otherwise? What's absurd is taking on a .50 BMG rifleman at 200 yards using .22 sub-sonic out of a 10 inch carbine.
 
Old 07-30-2016, 10:55 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
From: Central Arkansas

Posts: 3,959
Who said that a .22 is "so dangerous at a mile"...?
 
 
Old 07-31-2016, 12:48 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,430
millions "think" so, cause of the warning on the ammo box. are you trying to say differently?
 
Old 07-31-2016, 01:04 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
From: Central Arkansas

Posts: 3,959
Not saying anything other than I don't remember anyone saying how dangerous the 22 is at a mile.

Apparently neither do you, since the answer to my question is that there's a 'warning on the ammo box'.
 
Reply

  Arms Locker > Arms Locker > Reloading


Thread Tools
Display Modes






Powered by vBulletin 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 2003 - 2011 Arms Locker. All rights reserved.